This blogger shows some interesting historical details concerning the Canadian "hangman". Regardless of your views on capital punishment, this is an interesting read.
Thank you Mr. Lincoln for this article.

Kingston's Cold Gray Tower
I awoke early on this cool day. It is still winter nothing has changed since last night. But the day was colder still as I looked across the road at the tall, imposing gray stone tower that stands to the side of one of the main thorough Fares of Kingston, Ontario.
I asked someone what it was and the answer was simple, “Hanging!”
No kidding? – yep – Hanging!
As you look at it closer the design is something special. There are windows – or at least at one time there were windows. Now they are covered in. The stone work is very unique and would have been completed by experts in stone masonry of their day.
It sits just north of the old and infamous Women’s Prison building in Kingston. It is also just a short distance north up the road from the famous and ancient Kingston Prison ground – or KP as my other friends know it.
On Friday February 13th I had written about Peterborough’s Last hanging.
This Gray Stone Tower sparked another thread of thinking as I stayed so close by – literally across the street from where it stands quietly as a reminder of our gruesome past in Canada.
(Perhaps as some of my American Readers that follow this Blog – there will be some extra thinking going on – in that a number of your states still carry on the practice of Capital Punishment – the Death Sentence)
The information that I share here was hard to find. I was searching for information on the Cold Gray Tower standing alone in Kingston as a testimony to our past… but found nothing. But what I did find was an amazing. Please read all of the article related to the link below – “capitalpunishment”.
I point to one man referred to in the article… Arthur B. English. His was also known as “Arthur Ellis”… and was a cousin to a man that used the name “John Ellis” in England.
The quote from the article tells the story better…
“1865 – Arthur B. English was born in England. He was the cousin of England’s official hangman John Ellis. Arthur English became the hangman in the Middle East and South Africa. English then became the Official Executioner for the Dominion of Canada in 1913. His pseudonym was Arthur Ellis. He officiated at 549 executions. He died in 1938 and is buried in the Mount Royal Cemetery, Quebec. Arthur Ellis continued to be the pseudonym of the Canadian Executioner until the last execution in 1962, and abolition of capital punishment in 1976.” – end quote…
Can you imagine… he attended to 549 deaths by hanging. In the Peterborough Story of the last hanging in our city – he did that one too. As the official “Hangman” for Canada… he traveled everywhere to do the “job”.
Quoting the article again…
“1867-July-01 – After Confederation, the Dominion of Canada’s Department of Justice kept the record of names, dates, and places of 705 executions in Canada until the last two on December 11, 1962 at the Toronto ‘Don’ Jail. Two of the first hangings after Confederation in Ontario were John Hoag in Walkerton, and Ethan Allen in Kingston.”
That is 705 people(known and recorded) killed with a sharp stretching of their neck. “Arthur Ellis” watched it happen 549 times. Do you suppose that he had a rather difficult time with his “dreams”? I do.
Something needs to be known about hanging before I go further with this thought… quoting again the article as it told of Canada’s early Hangman – John Radclive(Radcliff)
“1890 - Canada’s executioner was John Radclive (Radcliff). He held this position until 1912 when he died. His one contribution to the "science of hanging" was the construction of a gallows that had a rope go over the top beam. One end of the rope was fastened around the neck of the accused and the other end held an iron weight (350 lbs.) which was dropped thus yanking the victim off the ground and dislocating his neck, resulting in instantaneous death (a technique affectionately known as the "jerk'em up gallows").”
The article shared also…
“The new technique was not a success for Radclive, as Birchall (Oxford County Jail) died of strangulation 18 minutes after the weight fell because the "drop" did not dislocate his neck. Radclive discarded his invention and went back to conventional hanging. Radclive died in Toronto in 1912 from excessive drinking after hanging 132 persons. He was one person who used his real name when acting as executioner. He used the alias of Thomas Ratley for his social life.”
Enter Arthur Ellis…
“1913 - With the loss of Radclive in 1912, there was a need for an experienced hangman for the Dominion. Arthur English, an ex-English army officer serving in the Middle East as an executioner was unofficially approached by the Canadian government to move to Canada.
English came from a family of executioners who worked in England for almost 300 years and whose uncle was then an official hangman in England under the pseudonym of John Ellis. English accepted the offer and moved to Montreal where he took the trade name of Arthur Ellis after his uncle.”
When he did the hanging there was a problem. He had continued to use the practice used by Radclive – dropping a 350 pound weight – the jerk-em up gallows.
The article states these gruesome thoughts…
"1935 - Ellis’ last hanging was done at the famous Bordeaux Jail in Montreal on 28 March 1935. Ellis had been called to Montreal to execute Leon Gagliardi, Angelo Donafrie and Mrs. Thomasina Sarao after they were found guilty of killing Nicholas Sarao in an intricate insurance scam.
Ellis was now 71 years old and had either assisted at or performed over 600 executions throughout his career in England, the Middle East and Canada. He was a master at his trade, yet this hanging would be his last because of a disastrous set of events that had him boycotted from further hangings. It seems that when Ellis went to weigh Mrs. Sarao at the Women's Jail he was not permitted access and had to be satisfied with the weight handed to him on a piece of paper. Based on the weight given to him Ellis calculated the length of rope needed to break Mrs. Sarao's neck.
On the morning of the hanging Mrs. Sarao walked to the gallows some 32 pounds heavier than what had been scratched on the piece of paper and when she plunged to her death the extra weight supplied enough force to decapitate her. It was not the first execution in which Ellis had miscalculated the condemned person’s weight.
On August 25, 1926, Ellis was called to carry out the execution of 240 pound Dan Prockiw at Headingly Jail. Prockiw, a former real-estate owner in Winnipeg, had been convicted of the March 18th beating death of his common-law wife, Annie Cardno. The drop was too much for Prockiw’s heavy body and the result was it jerked his head right off his body.
However because it was a woman that was decapitated, the execution of Mrs. Sarao marked the end of Ellis' 22-year career as Canada's "Official" Hangman and it effectively ended the practice of allowing the public to attend hangings. Ellis died three years later in his hotel room in Montreal. Although open public hangings were discontinued since about 1869, members of the public could still acquire a pass to attend a hanging inside the jail walls."
Did you catch that Mr. Ellis was 71 years old when he did his last hanging – the disastrous one of Mrs. Sarao. He died 3 years later in a lonely hotel room.
Back to the Cold Gray Tower in Kingston. From what I can gather (and perhaps have read between the lines to gather) the tower was built make the Hanging less of a community show – which people from all around gathered to see. The Cold Gray Tower was perhaps the first demonstration of humanitarian effort in our country.
Personally – every automobile accident that I have attended – being often the first one to help had left a deep mark on my memory. The same is true of each death that I attend as a Hospital Chaplain. You never forget.
I can feel pity for “Mr. Arthur Ellis” and his family.
Away back in my early days in Walkerton, Ontario and my early involvement with that jail, I met one of the guards that had attended the last hanging in that jail. That man was never the same after that job of “witnessing”… he drank himself to sleep to sooth the misery and nightmares that he had.
As I stared at the Tower for a long time… I was very quiet… very quiet.
I wonder what God thought at each of those moments of finality – when someone said, “May God have mercy on your soul…”. Perhaps it should have also included… “and May God have mercy on our souls as well.”
~ Murray Lincoln ~
8 comments:
Hey Reilly,
Thanks for the very interesting post. I lived a block away from the Cold Gray Tower for a year when I was at university in Kingston. I never really thought about the history.
I don't have a strong opinion about capital punishment. The fear of a death sentence certainly doesn't seem to deter people from committing heinous crimes. It doesn't allow for those who are truly repentant and whom God would forgive and restore. A sentence like this certainly must make the perpetrator really think about his/her life choices. It's a sad world we live in.
I for one would line up and wait (like a boxing day shopper at Best Buy)to throw the switch and have the privilege of taking part in JUSTICE.
We like to talk about justice for the poor but we necer want to address the other side of the issue, there are dire penalties for crime!
it is not our (the justice system) job to redeem people, that is God's job. If we have death penalty does that take away God's option to redeem?
So God can't save people if we practice capital punishment?
Anonymous,
I appreciate your comments, as well as Lydia's. My point here is to take note of the history of the hangman, and reflect how wounded they were after hundreds of execution. I think it is naive to presume that there is no emotional and mental baggage to executing human life.
As for your comments about it not being our job to redeem people, yes of course God draws people to salvation; however, we are called to be agents of redemption, or as the Apostle Paul called it, ministers of reconciliation.
2 Cor 5:18-19
All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation: that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ, not counting men's sins against them. And he has committed to us the message of reconciliation.
It begs the question, how are we modeling the ministry of reconciliation in capital punishment?
Yes God can redeem people in spite of capital punishment, but that doesn't change the fact that life is sacred (no matter who's it is) and we do not live in an eye for an eye system (if you believe in the Bible) We live in a system Jesus established that extends the law of Moses to show that the law (do not murder, steal, lie etc) is committed by all of us with no exceptions. None of us are capable of keeping the law, and all deserve to be put to death.
consider these scriptures...
Matt 5:38-39
"You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Matt 5:43-48
"You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you: Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be sons of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous.If you love those who love you, what reward will you get? Are not even the tax collectors doing that? And if you greet only your brothers, what are you doing more than others? Do not even pagans do that? Be perfect, therefore, as your heavenly Father is perfect.
1 John 3:15
Anyone who hates his brother is a murderer, and you know that no murderer has eternal life in him.
In other words, have you hated someone Anonymous? If you answered yes, according to God, you are are a murderer. Now considering this are you (lining-up like a boxing day sale at bestbuy) going to be as quick to throw your own switch?
I don't intend on patronizing you with Scripture, but invite you to consider your own innocence.
There are many other issues I could address, but I'll leave it at that for now.
Thanks for the discussion
Hey Riley. One night after work I got looking at folk music on You Tube and I came across a video by Steve Earle. The song was in support of banning capital punishment.As the tune played faces came across the screen of the hundreds of people executed in Texas over a given period of time. A few years I think ,it wasn't very long.As the faces past - some were old, some young,white, black,hispanic, female - I began to feel great compassion for these people , and I wondered about there families and friends.
After the video I read the comments that were pretty much all anti-capital punishment,but there was one fellow who suggested we google the names of the "victims".
I ended up spending all night reading about unspeakable,hienous crimes,piles of evidence and the most innocent of victims. It seemed there were no crimes of passion or sudden violence among the cases, just vicious ,mean,vile murder of completely unsuspecting innocent people.
My compassion melted away. This is a very tough topic. I've never swayed back and forth on anything this much.
2Cor. We are reconciled through Christ though repentance and faith. This is not so we can let the unrepentant murderer terrorize the innocent.1Cor13:7 says love protects.
Matt 5 says pray for those who persecute YOU not who persecute the innocent
Turn the other cheek also refers to YOU not a third innocent party that you are to protect.
Food for thought. Good blog.
Rock on Riley!!!
Thanks for those thoughts Thom, definitely some food for thought!
Let me just point out a few observations...
I am not pro-offender, neither am I soley pro-victim either. I am pro-people, and pro-life.
There is indeed heinous things done by human beings to innocent people, but is the answer an eye for an eye?
I agree that we should not allow people to terrorize the innocent, but justice can be accomplished without capital punishment, those two things are not automatically linked together. It is a little known fact that it is more expensive to maintain capital punishment in the united states than to keep someone in prison for life. It costs 3-5 times more for the taxpayer to execute lifers, than keep them in maximum prison for the the rest of their lives!
Check out this website, it seems to give a balanced perspective on capital punishment
http://www.balancedpolitics.org/death_penalty.htm
I think you missed the point of the passages I shared...2 Cor talks about receiving the ministry of reconciliation in order to be people who live out reconciliation in our relationships and our message...and do not hold people's sins against them.
You wrote, "Matt 5 says pray for those who persecute YOU not who persecute the innocent"
I believe you are wrong here. Jesus was speaking to people that were oppressed and innocent, they were occupied by a tyrannical government called the Romans. Jesus calls them to do this in the face of their oppressors. Remember the Sermon on the Mount is not a call to pacifism, turning the other cheek was true justice, combating evil with kindness was Jesus' way of empowering his followers.
Here is a few more scriptures to think through...
Romans 12 says,
17Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everybody. 18If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. 19Do not take revenge, my friends, but leave room for God's wrath, for it is written: "It is mine to avenge; I will repay," says the Lord. On the contrary:
"If your enemy is hungry, feed him; if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.
In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head." 21Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.
I believe in protecting the innocent. There are many ways to do this without compromising the value of human life. By overcoming evil with good, Paul teaches we can make a difference in people's lives.
Does it make sense to kill someone who has killed, in order to teach that killing is wrong?
You mentioned the vicious nature of certain crimes, and not having compassion for criminals. I, personally have to believe that God's grace can extend to the darkest of sins, and that they can be restored and forgiven in this life and the next. It minimizes and under appreciates God's grace, if compassion cannot be extended to a murderer (who happens to be made in God's image).
As always, I appreciate the discussion.
Hey all (Anon, Thom, Rielly),
I agree that we should extend grace to all people. Grace and justice are not mutually exclusive however. Nor does grace mean leniency to crime. Punishment is in fact a demonstration of long-term grace (because it teaches the person a lesson they need to learn), or societal grace (as it teaches the life is sacred). For this reason, to under-punish for a crime is to under-teach the offender and society the gravity of their sin. I would argue that the minimization of punishment for particularly heinous crimes minimizes people's belief that life is sacred. Therefore, to be pro-life is to be pro-death when innocent lives are taken.
It is interesting that the character of God reflects the paradox of being pro-life and yet pro-punishment all at once. Sometimes he disciples us because he loves us, otehr times he makes us sick when we profane holy things (like the Lord's Supper-1 Cor 11), and he strikes people down for sin (as was the case with Ananias and Sapphira on Acts). The point is that we need not choose love over hate, reconciliation over vengence, etc. These matters exist in paradox.
I would also suggest that the verses quoted above relate to an individual's response to personal injuctice. Jesus words in Matthew relate to being slapped with the "potty hand" and do not relate to permitting violence or being passive toward CP (as the acciomnaying analogies imply). Matt 5 and Rom 12 are also individual ethics for the Christian and do not relate to a state's authority to execute or not. Everyone should keep in mind that Paul also taught in Romans that the criminal should fear the authority of the government to wield the sword. There are very different ethical systems attached to individuals and states in both testaments. Neither ethical system is ruled by hatred (one does not have to hate a murderer to execute her). At the same times, states are permitted to do things by God that individuals are not permitted to so. State governments can tax, expropriate property, call up armies, arrest people, etc--all things that would be considered unethical should an individual do such a thing.
I've often asked anti-CP proponents to offer New Testament Scripture that abolishes a (government's) right to take the lives of murderers. Can anyone offer some?
Regarding Rielly's entry--I wonder what you mean by not being "soley pro-victim"? The terminology is strange to me. Do you mean to imply that we should not favour a victim over a murderer?
I too think this is a good discussion to have.
Post a Comment